De relatie tussen strategie en organisatieklimaat op het strategisch gedrag van medewerkers: Het belang van fit en commitment



Dovnload 0.67 Mb.
Pagina7/8
Datum24.07.2016
Grootte0.67 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8



Bepalen HR Klimaat volgens methode 1

HRClimate aangemaakt.




Descriptive Statisticsa




N

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

HRClimate

20

1,40

3,80

3,0300

,47362

Valid N (listwise)

20













a. firmcode = 5















Descriptive Statisticsa




N

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

HRClimate

29

1,70

4,50

3,1690

,69236

Valid N (listwise)

29













a. firmcode = 4















Descriptive Statisticsa




N

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

HRClimate

19

1,00

4,40

2,3234

,97069

Valid N (listwise)

19













a. firmcode = 3















Descriptive Statisticsa




N

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

HRClimate

63

1,00

4,00

2,1113

,74622

Valid N (listwise)

63













a. firmcode = 2















Descriptive Statisticsa




N

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

HRClimate

29

1,00

5,00

2,6487

,95806

Valid N (listwise)

29













a. firmcode = 1












HRSEmax is 0,958. HRStrength is per org:

1: (0,971 + 0,2) – 0,958 = 0,213

2: 1,171 – 0,746 = 0,425

3: 1,171 – 0,971 = 0,2

4: 1,171 – 0,692 = 0,479

5: 1,171 – 0,474 = 0,697

Bepalen strategisch gedrag

Wordt gemeten in kennis, innovatie en klantgerichtheid. Variabele aanmaken: Kennis, Inn en Klantgerichtheid (allemaal gemiddelden van items).




Correlations










SKfit

Strat_Gedrag

Spearman's rho

SKfit

Correlation Coefficient

1,000

,231**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.

,003

N

161

160

Strat_Gedrag

Correlation Coefficient

,231**

1,000

Sig. (2-tailed)

,003

.

N

160

160

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).






Bepalen HRClimate als mediator


Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

4,084

,206




19,801

,000

geslacht

-,152

,115

-,110

-1,318

,190

leeftijd

-,024

,045

-,051

-,521

,603

indienst

-,018

,034

-,051

-,526

,600

opleiding

-,062

,036

-,148

-1,731

,086

2

(Constant)

3,808

,241




15,806

,000

geslacht

-,118

,115

-,086

-1,033

,303

leeftijd

-,010

,045

-,022

-,225

,822

indienst

,004

,035

,011

,109

,914

opleiding

-,058

,035

-,139

-1,637

,104

SKfit

,015

,007

,190

2,146

,033

3

(Constant)

3,228

,271




11,909

,000

geslacht

-,066

,110

-,047

-,597

,552

leeftijd

-,018

,043

-,038

-,405

,686

indienst

,025

,034

,071

,735

,463

opleiding

-,049

,034

-,118

-1,467

,145

SKfit

,012

,007

,145

1,699

,092

HRClimate

,190

,047

,318

4,023

,000

a. Dependent Variable: Strat_Gedrag









Zoals te zien is, wordt het hoofdeffect bij model 2 van SKfit van significant (B=0.190; p <0.05) bij model 3, waar HRClimate is toegevoegd, niet meer significant (B=1,699; 0.05 < P < 0.10). Er is dus sprake van een mediator effect.


Voor moderator effect:


Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

4,084

,206




19,801

,000

geslacht

-,152

,115

-,110

-1,318

,190

leeftijd

-,024

,045

-,051

-,521

,603

indienst

-,018

,034

-,051

-,526

,600

opleiding

-,062

,036

-,148

-1,731

,086

2

(Constant)

3,808

,241




15,806

,000

geslacht

-,118

,115

-,086

-1,033

,303

leeftijd

-,010

,045

-,022

-,225

,822

indienst

,004

,035

,011

,109

,914

opleiding

-,058

,035

-,139

-1,637

,104

SKfit

,015

,007

,190

2,146

,033

3

(Constant)

3,228

,271




11,909

,000

geslacht

-,066

,110

-,047

-,597

,552

leeftijd

-,018

,043

-,038

-,405

,686

indienst

,025

,034

,071

,735

,463

opleiding

-,049

,034

-,118

-1,467

,145

SKfit

,012

,007

,145

1,699

,092

HRClimate

,190

,047

,318

4,023

,000

4

(Constant)

3,200

,272




11,774

,000

geslacht

-,063

,110

-,045

-,572

,568

leeftijd

-,014

,043

-,031

-,331

,741

indienst

,027

,034

,078

,813

,418

opleiding

-,055

,034

-,131

-1,613

,109

SKfit

,008

,008

,094

,974

,332

HRClimate

,204

,049

,342

4,181

,000

Interact_HR_Stratfit

,012

,010

,102

1,127

,262

a. Dependent Variable: Strat_Gedrag












De interactie tussen HRClimate en Strategiefit is niet significant (p = 0,262) en daarmee bestaat er geen moderatoreffect in dit onderzoek, maar wel een mediatoreffect.





Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

2,880

,076




38,075

,000

SKfit

,068

,013

,385

5,246

,000

2

(Constant)

1,487

,307




4,845

,000

SKfit

,054

,012

,306

4,298

,000

Affteam_total

,385

,083

,332

4,664

,000

a. Dependent Variable: Innovatie















Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

3,479

,062




55,847

,000

SKfit

,049

,011

,347

4,622

,000

2

(Constant)

2,366

,255




9,262

,000

SKfit

,038

,010

,267

3,660

,000

Affteam_total

,308

,069

,327

4,476

,000

a. Dependent Variable: Kennis















Correlations










SKfit

Kennis

Innovatie

Klantgerichtheid

Spearman's rho

SKfit

Correlation Coefficient

1,000

,396**

,339**

,130

Sig. (2-tailed)

.

,000

,000

,103

N

161

158

160

159

Kennis

Correlation Coefficient

,396**

1,000

,408**

,316**

Sig. (2-tailed)

,000

.

,000

,000

N

158

158

158

157

Innovatie

Correlation Coefficient

,339**

,408**

1,000

,336**

Sig. (2-tailed)

,000

,000

.

,000

N

160

158

160

159

Klantgerichtheid

Correlation Coefficient

,130

,316**

,336**

1,000

Sig. (2-tailed)

,103

,000

,000

.

N

159

157

159

159

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).














Bepalen medierende relatie van affectiviteit met organisatie & werk op strategisch gedrag


Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

2,880

,076




38,075

,000

SKfit

,068

,013

,385

5,246

,000

2

(Constant)

1,782

,348




5,114

,000

SKfit

,064

,013

,363

5,068

,000

Afforg_total

,360

,112

,231

3,225

,002

a. Dependent Variable: Innovatie












Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

3,901

,101




38,652

,000

SKfit

,026

,017

,122

1,537

,126

2

(Constant)

3,503

,480




7,296

,000

SKfit

,025

,017

,115

1,443

,151

Afforg_total

,131

,154

,067

,847

,398

a. Dependent Variable: Klantgerichtheid












Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

,916

,412




2,222

,028

SKfit

,045

,012

,257

3,620

,000

Afforg_total

,074

,118

,047

,627

,532

Affwerk_total

,093

,075

,108

1,231

,220

Affocc_total

,132

,091

,107

1,458

,147

Afflei_total

,098

,059

,145

1,659

,099

Affteam_total

,215

,093

,186

2,326

,021

2

(Constant)

,927

,405




2,287

,024

SKfit

,038

,012

,217

3,035

,003

Afforg_total

,040

,117

,025

,340

,734

Affwerk_total

,072

,075

,083

,963

,337

Affocc_total

,118

,089

,095

1,326

,187

Afflei_total

,064

,059

,095

1,076

,284

Affteam_total

,204

,091

,176

2,240

,027

HRClimate

,155

,061

,199

2,543

,012

3

(Constant)

,924

,406




2,275

,024

SKfit

,039

,013

,221

3,067

,003

Afforg_total

,041

,117

,026

,349

,727

Affwerk_total

,077

,075

,090

1,024

,308

Affocc_total

,115

,090

,093

1,279

,203

Afflei_total

,065

,060

,097

1,093

,276

Affteam_total

,206

,091

,178

2,253

,026

HRClimate

,147

,063

,189

2,323

,022

Interact_HR_Stratfit

-,005

,010

-,035

-,510

,611

a. Dependent Variable: Innovatie














Referenties
Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology , 63(1), 1-18.

Beal, R.M. (2000), Competing effectively: environmental scanning, competitive strategy

and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms, Journal of Small Business

Management, 38 (1), 27-47
Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., & Ulrich, D. (2001). The HR scorecard: Linking people, strategy and

performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press


Bluedorn, A. C., & Lundgren, E. F. (1993). A culture‐match perspective for strategic change. Research

in organizational change and development (7), 137‐179.
Bollinger A. S., & Smith, R. D. (2001). Managing organizational knowledge as a strategic asset. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5 (1), 8-18.
Bowen, D.E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the “Strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203-221.

Burton, R.M., & Obel, B. (1998). Strategic organizational diagnosis and design: Developing theory for application (2nd ed.). Boston: Kluwer.

Burton, R. M., Lauridsen, J., & Obel, B. (2004). The impact of organizational climate and strategic fit on firm performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), 67-82.

Buzell, R. D., & Gale, B. T. (1987). The PIMS principles: linking strategy and performance. New York:

Free Press.
Dess, G.G., & Davis, P.S.(1984), Porter’s generic strategies as determinants of strategic

membership and organizational performance, Academy of Management Journal, 27, 467-488


Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizationalclimate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21, 619–665.

Doty, D. H., Glick, W. H., & Huber, G. P. (1993). Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1198–1250.



1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8


De database wordt beschermd door het auteursrecht ©opleid.info 2017
stuur bericht

    Hoofdpagina